Page 164 - 《应用声学》2021年第4期
P. 164

648                                                                                  2021 年 7 月


             [51] Zhang H, Thurber C, Rowe C. Automatic P-wave arrival  [59] Wedderburn R W. Quasi-likelihood functions, general-
                 detection and picking with multiscale wavelet analysis for  ized linear models, and the Gauss–Newton method[J].
                 single-component recordings[J]. Bulletin of the Seismolog-  Biometrika, 1974, 61(3): 439–447.
                 ical Society of America, 2003, 93(5): 1904–1912.  [60] Hormati A, Jovanović I, Roy O, et al. Robust ultrasound
             [52] Senkaya M, Karsli H. A semi-automatic approach to iden-  travel-time tomography using the bent ray model[C]. Pro-
                 tify first arrival time:  the cross-correlation technique  ceedings of the Medical Imaging 2010: Ultrasonic Imag-
                 (CCT)[J]. Earth Sciences Research Journal, 2014, 18(2):  ing, Tomography, and Therapy, F, 2010.
                 107–113.                                       [61] Intrator M, Lin Y, Chen T, et al. Ultrasound bent-ray to-
             [53] Lee M, Byun J, Kim D, et al. Improved modified energy  mography with a modified total-variation regularization
                 ratio method using a multi-window approach for accurate  scheme[C]. Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2015: Ul-
                 arrival picking[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2017,  trasonic Imaging and Tomography, F, 2015.
                 139: 117–130.                                  [62] Lin Y, Huang L. Ultrasound waveform tomography with
             [54] Li C, Huang L, Duric N, et al.  An improved auto-  a modified total-variation regularization scheme[C]. Pro-
                 matic time-of-flight picker for medical ultrasound tomog-  ceedings of the Medical Imaging 2013: Ultrasonic Imag-
                 raphy[J]. Ultrasonics, 2009, 49(1): 61–72.        ing, Tomography, and Therapy, F, 2013.
             [55] Qu X, Azuma T, Imoto H, et al. Novel automatic first-  [63] Nuyts J, Michel C, Dupont P. Maximum-likelihood
                 arrival picking method for ultrasound sound-speed to-  expectation-maximization  reconstruction  of  sino-
                 mography[J]. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2015,  grams with arbitrary noise distribution using NEC-
                 54(7S1): 07HF10.                                  transformations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imag-
             [56] Greenleaf J F, Bahn R C. Clinical imaging with transmis-  ing, 2001, 20(5): 365–375.
                 sive ultrasonic computerized tomography[J]. IEEE Trans-  [64] Merčep E, Herraiz J L, Deán-Ben X L, et al. Transmis-
                 actions on Biomedical Engineering, 1981, 28(2): 177–185.  sion–reflection optoacoustic ultrasound (TROPUS) com-
             [57] Schreiman J S, Gisvold J S, Greenleaf J F, et al.  puted tomography of small animals[J]. Light: Science &
                 Ultrasound transmission computed tomography of the  Applications, 2019, 8(1): 1–12.
                 breast[J]. Radiology, 1984, 150(2): 523–530.   [65] Ali R, Hsieh S, Dahl J. Open-source Gauss-Newton-based
             [58] Greenleaf J F, Johnson S A, Lent A H. Measurement of  methods for refraction-corrected ultrasound computed to-
                 spatial distribution of refractive index in tissues by ul-  mography[C]. Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2019:
                 trasonic computer assisted tomography[J]. Ultrasound in  Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography, F, 2019.
                 Medicine and Biology, 1978, 3(4): 337–339.
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166