Page 236 - 《应用声学》2025年第1期

232 2025 年 1 月

ban forests: A pilot study across 49 parks in China[J]. 2023, 40(3): 82–86, 112.
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2022, 73: 127613. [14] Hammoud R, Tognin S, Burgess L, et al. Smartphone-
[3] Stobbe E, Lorenz R C, Kühn S. On how natural and urban based ecological momentary assessment reveals mental
soundscapes alter brain activity during cognitive perfor- health benefits of birdlife[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022,
mance[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2023, 91: 12(1): 17589.
102141. [15] Manohare M, Rajasekar E, Parida M. Electroencephalog-
[4] Jia Y, Ma H, Kang J, et al. The preservation value of raphy based classification of emotions associated with
urban soundscape and its determinant factors[J]. Applied road traffic noise using Gradient boosting algorithm[J].
Acoustics, 2020, 168: 107430. Applied Acoustics, 2023, 206: 109306.
[5] 赵莹, 申小莉, 李晟, 等. 声景生态学研究进展和展望 [J]. 生 [16] 陈方华, 柯文棋, 顾卫国, 等. 皮电生物反馈训练对被试者生理
物多样性, 2020, 28(7): 806–820. 及心理影响的研究 [J]. 海军医学杂志, 2005, 26(2): 115–116.
Zhao Yeng, Shen Xiaoli, Li Sheng, et al. Progress and Chen Fanghua, Ke Wenqi, Gu Weiguo, et al. Physio-
outlook for soundscape ecology[J]. Biodiversity Science, logical and psychological effects of galvanic skin response
2020, 28(7): 806–820. biofeedback training on the subjects[J]. Journal of Navy
[6] 刘江, 朱天媛, 洪昕晨. 城市森林公园声源感知的时空动态与 Medicine, 2005, 26(2): 115–116.
空间依赖性特征研究 [J]. 中国园林, 2022, 38(12): 64–69. [17] Li Z Z, Kang J. Sensitivity analysis of changes in human
Liu Jiang, Zhu Tianyuan, Hong Xichen. Study on the physiological indicators observed in soundscapes[J]. Land-
spatio-temporal dynamic and spatial dependency charac- scape and Urban Planning, 2019, 190: 103593.
teristics of sound source perception in urban forest park[J]. [18] Lin W, Chen Q, Jiang M, et al. Sitting or walking? An-
Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2022, 38(12): 64–69. alyzing the neural emotional indicators of urban green
[7] 朱玉洁, 翁羽西, 王心怡, 等. 森林公园声景对心理恢复效益 space behavior with mobile EEG[J]. Journal of Urban
的影响 ——以福州国家森林公园为例 [J]. 应用声学, 2023, Health, 2020, 97(4): 191–203.
42(2): 340–348. [19] Wang T C, Sit H P, Tang T W, et al. Psychological and
Zhu Yujie, Weng Yuxi, Wang Xinyi, et al. The ef- physiological responses in patients with generalized anxi-
fect of soundscape in forest park on psychological bene- ety disorder: The use of acute exercise and virtual reality
fits——Taking Fuzhou National Forest Park as an exam- environment[J]. International Journal of Environmental
ple[J]. Journal of Applied Acoustics, 2023, 42(2): 340–348. Research and Public Health, 2020, 17: 4855.
[8] Jeon J Y, Jo H I, Lee K. Psycho-physiological restoration [20] Goto S, Morota Y, Liu C, et al. The mechanism of re-
with audio-visual interactions through virtual reality sim- laxation by viewing a Japanese garden: A pilot study[J].
ulations of soundscape and landscape experiences in ur- HERD: Health Environments Research & Design, 2020,
ban, waterfront, and green environments[J]. Sustainable 13(4): 31–43.
Cities and Society, 2023, 99: 104929. [21] Hassan A, Tao J, Li G, et al. Effects of walking in bam-
[9] 王亚平, 尹春航, 籍仙荣, 等. 城市历史街区声景观及视听感 boo forest and city environments on brainwave activity
知实验研究 [J]. 应用声学, 2020, 39(1): 104–111. in young adults[J]. Evidence-Based Complementary and
Wang Yaping, Yin Chunhang, Ji Xianrong, et al. Experi- Alternative Medicine, 2018, 9: 9653857.
mental study on soundscape and audio-visual perception [22] Mostajeran F, Krzikawski J, Steinicke F, et al. Effects of
of urban historic district[J]. Journal of Applied Acoustics, exposure to immersive videos and photo slideshows of for-
2020, 39(1): 104–111. est and urban environments[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021,
[10] Alcocer I, Lima H, Sugai L S M, et al. Acoustic indices 11(1): 1–14.
as proxies for biodiversity: A meta-analysis[J]. Biological [23] 雷旭, 尧德中. 同步脑电 -功能磁共振 (EEG-fMRI) 原理与技
Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2022, 术 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014: 3.
97(6): 2209–2236. [24] 李哲, 陈菲菲, 韩笑, 等. 基于脑电分析技术的景观关注度主
[11] 白梓彤, 王成, 赵伊琳, 等. 北京城市公园冬季声景特征 [J]. 应 成分量化解析 ——以南京市玄武湖公园为例 [J]. 中国园林,
用声学, 2023, 42(2): 333–339. 2021, 37(7): 60–65.
Bai Ziting, Wang Cheng, Zhao Yilin, et al. Soundscape Li Zhe, Chen Feifei, Han Xiao, et al. The principal com-
characteristics of urban park in winter in Beijing[J]. Jour- ponent quantitative analysis of landscape attraction based
nal of Applied Acoustics, 2023, 42(2): 333–339. on the EEG technology——Taking Xuanwu Lake Park of
[12] Sarrou M, Schmitz P M, Hamm N, et al. Sound frequency Nanjing as the example[J]. Chinese Landscape Architec-
affects the auditory motion-onset response in humans[J]. ture, 2021, 37(7): 60–65.
Experimental Brain Research, 2018, 236(10): 2713–2726. [25] Rounds J D, Cruz-Garza J G, Kalantari S. Using poste-
[13] 岳思阳, 李新欣. 基于主客观分析方法的室外声环境实验设 rior EEG theta band to assess the effects of architectural
计 [J]. 实验技术与管理, 2023, 40(3) : 82–86, 112. designs on landmark recognition in an urban setting[J].
Yue Siyang, Li Xinxin. Experimental design of outdoor Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2020, 14: 584385.
acoustic environment based on subjective and objective [26] 王雁, 陈鑫峰. 心理物理学方法在国外森林景观评价中的应
analysis[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 用 [J]. 林业科学, 1999(5): 110–117.