Page 151 - 《应用声学》2020年第4期
P. 151
第 39 卷 第 4 期 吴礼福等: 调节水床效应的双梯度有源噪声控制自适应算法 637
[5] Elliott S J. Signal processing for active control[M]. Lon- [10] Lei L, Sun J, Huang B. A novel feedback active noise
don: Academic, 2001: 257–259. control for broadband chaotic noise and random noise[J].
[6] Ardekani I T, Abdulla W H. Effects of imperfect sec- Applied Acoustics, 2017, 116: 229–237.
ondary path modeling on adaptive active noise control [11] Wu L, Qiu X, Guo Y. A simplified adaptive feedback ac-
systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Tech- tive noise control system[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2014, 81:
nology, 2012, 20(5): 1252–1262. 40–46.
[12] Qiu X, Hansen C H. A study of time-domain FXLMS
[7] Sakai H, Miyagi S. Analysis of the adaptive filter algo-
algorithms with control output constraint[J]. The Jour-
rithm for feedback-type active noise control[J]. Signal Pro-
nal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2001, 109(2):
cessing, 2003, 83(2): 1291–1298.
2815–2823.
[8] Doyle J C, Francis B A, Tannernbaum A R. Feedback
[13] Wu L, Qiu X, Guo Y. A generalized leaky FxLMS algo-
control theory[M]. New York: MaxWell MacMillan Inter- rithm for tuning the waterbed effect of feedback active
national, 1992: 144–146. noise control systems[J]. Mechanical Systems & Signal
[9] 张丽敏, 祖峰磊, 邱小军, 等. 反馈有源噪声控制系统水床效 Processing, 2018, 106: 13–23.
应的分析与改善 [J]. 应用声学, 2010, 29(2): 401–408. [14] 陈珏, 玉昊昕, 陈克安. 三类有源噪声控制算法性能比较 [J].
Zhang Limin, Zu Fenglei, Qiu Xiaojun, et al. Analy- 噪声与振动控制, 2013, 33(4): 107–113.
sis and improvement on waterbed effect of feedback ac- Chen Jue, Yu Haoxin, Chen Ke’an. Comparison of perfor-
tive noise control system[J]. Journal of Applied Acoustics, mance of three types of active noise control algorithms[J].
2010, 29(2): 401–408. Noise and Vibration Control, 2013, 33(4): 107–113.