Page 134 - 201805
P. 134

716                                                                                  2018 年 9 月


             [74] Huang C R, Hsieh S F. Robust 3-D crosstalk canceller de-  [89] Song M S, Zhang C, Florencio D, et al. An interactive 3-D
                 sign[C]//Multimedia and Expo, 2007 IEEE International  audio system with loudspeakers[J]. IEEE Transactions on
                 Conference on. IEEE, 2007: 1882–1885.             Multimedia, 2011, 13(5): 844–855.
             [75] Wang J, Ye Q, Zheng C, et al.  A robust algo-  [90] Georgiou P G, Mouchtaris A, Roumeliotis S I, et
                 rithm for binaural audio reproduction using loudspeak-  al. Immersive sound rendering using laser-based track-
                 ers[C]//Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Au-  ing[C]//Audio Engineering Society Convention 109. Au-
                 tomation (ICMTMA), 2010 International Conference on.  dio Engineering Society, 2000.
                 IEEE, 2010, 1: 318–321.                        [91] Kim S, Kong D, Jang S. Adaptive virtual surround sound
             [76] Wang J, Ye Q, Wu X. A robust frequency domain    rendering system for an arbitrary listening position[J]. J.
                 crosstalk cancellation algorithm[C]//Computer Applica-  Audio Eng. Soc., 2008, 56(4): 243–254.
                 tion and System Modeling (ICCASM), 2010 International  [92] Sandvad J. Dynamic aspects of auditory virtual envi-
                 Conference on. IEEE, 2010, 4: V4-568–V4-571.      ronments[C]//Audio Engineering Society Convention 100.
             [77] Bai M R, Tung C W, Lee C C. Optimal design of loud-  Audio Engineering Society, 1996.
                 speaker arrays for robust cross-talk cancellation using the  [93] Wenzel E M, Miller J D, Abel J S. Sound lab: a real-
                 Taguchi method and the genetic algorithm[J]. J. Acoust.  time, software-based system for the study of spatial hear-
                 Soc. Am., 2005, 117(5): 2802–2813.                ing[C]//Audio Engineering Society Convention 108. Au-
             [78] Xu H, Wang Q, Xia R, et al. A stochastic approxima-  dio Engineering Society, 2000.
                 tion method with enhanced robustness for crosstalk can-  [94] Bronkhorst A W. Localization of real and virtual sound
                 cellation[J]. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 2017, 26(6):  sources[J]. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1995, 98(5): 2542–2553.
                 1269–1275.                                     [95] Wenzel E M. Effect of increasing system latency on lo-
             [79] Ward D B, Elko G W. Effect of loudspeaker position on  calization of virtual sounds[C]//Audio Engineering Soci-
                 the robustness of acoustic crosstalk cancellation[J]. IEEE  ety Conference: 16th International Conference: Spatial
                 Signal Process. Lett., 1999, 6(5): 106–108.       Sound Reproduction. Audio Engineering Society, 1999.
             [80] Ward D B, Elko G W. A new robust system for 3D au-  [96] Brungart D, Kordik A J, Simpson B D. Effects of head
                 dio using loudspeakers[C]//Acoustics, Speech, and Signal  tracker latency in virtual audio displays[J]. J. Audio Eng.
                 Processing, 2000. ICASSP’00. Proceedings. 2000 IEEE  Soc., 2006, 54(1/2): 32–44.
                 International Conference on. IEEE, 2000, 2: II781–II784.  [97] Stitt P, Hendrickx E, Messonnier J C, et al. The influence
             [81] Yang J, Gan W S, Tan S E. Improved sound separation us-  of head tracking latency on binaural rendering in simple
                 ing three loudspeakers[J]. Acoustics Research Letters On-  and complex sound scenes[C]//Audio Engineering Society
                 line, 2003, 4(2): 47–52.                          Convention 140. Audio Engineering Society, 2016.
             [82] Zheng J, Lu J, Qiu X. Linear optimal source distribu-  [98] Krebber W, Gierlich H W, Genuit K. Auditory virtual
                 tion mapping for binaural sound reproduction[C]//Inter-  environments: basics and applications for interactive sim-
                 Noise and Noise-Con Congress and Conference Proceed-  ulations[J]. Signal Processing, 2000, 80(11): 2307–2322.
                 ings. Institute of Noise Control Engineering, 2014, 249(7):  [99] Simpson B D, Brungart D S, Gilkey R H, et al. Spa-
                 939–946.                                          tial audio displays for improving safety and enhancing
             [83] Zheng J, Zhu T, Lu J, et al. A linear robust binaural  situation awareness in general aviation environments[R].
                 sound reproduction system with optimal source distribu-  Wright State Univ.  Dayton Oh Dept.  of Psychology,
                 tion strategy[J]. J. Audio Eng. Soc., 2015, 63(9): 725–735.  2005.
             [84] Kirkeby O, Nelson P A, Hamada H. The “stereo dipole”:  [100] Jones D L, Stanney K M, Foaud H. An optimized spatial
                 a virtual source imaging system using two closely spaced  audio system for virtual training simulations: design and
                 loudspeakers[J]. J. Audio Eng. Soc., 1998, 46(5): 387–395.  evaluation[C]. Georgia Institute of Technology, 2005.
             [85] Takeuchi T, Nelson P A. Optimal source distribution for  [101] Jin C, Kan A, Lin D, et al. 3DApe: a real-time 3D audio
                 binaural synthesis over loudspeakers[J]. J. Acoust. Soc.  playback engine[C]//Audio Engineering Society Conven-
                 Am., 2002, 112(6): 2786–2797.                     tion 118. Audio Engineering Society, 2005.
             [86] Takeuchi T, Nelson P A. Extension of the optimal  [102] Cecchi S, Virgulti M, Primavera A, et al. Investigation
                 source distribution for binaural sound reproduction[J].  on audio algorithms architecture for stereo portable de-
                 Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 2008, 94(6): 981–987.  vices[J]. J. Audio Eng. Soc., 2016, 64(1/2): 75–88.
             [87] Kim Y, Deille O, Nelson P A. Crosstalk cancellation in  [103] Bai M R, Hong J R. Signal processing implementation and
                 virtual acoustic imaging systems for multiple listeners[J].  comparison of automotive spatial sound rendering strate-
                 J. Sound Vib., 2006, 297(1/2): 251–266.           gies[J]. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music
             [88] Masiero B, Qiu X. Two listeners crosstalk cancellation  Processing, 2009, 2009(1): 876297.
                 system modelled by four point sources and two rigid  [104] Zhang C, Cai Q, Chou P A, et al. Viewport: a distributed,
                 spheres[J]. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 2009,  immersive teleconferencing system with infrared dot pat-
                 95(2): 379–385.                                   tern[J]. IEEE Multi Media, 2013, 20(1): 17–27.
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139