Page 134 - 201805
P. 134
716 2018 年 9 月
[74] Huang C R, Hsieh S F. Robust 3-D crosstalk canceller de- [89] Song M S, Zhang C, Florencio D, et al. An interactive 3-D
sign[C]//Multimedia and Expo, 2007 IEEE International audio system with loudspeakers[J]. IEEE Transactions on
Conference on. IEEE, 2007: 1882–1885. Multimedia, 2011, 13(5): 844–855.
[75] Wang J, Ye Q, Zheng C, et al. A robust algo- [90] Georgiou P G, Mouchtaris A, Roumeliotis S I, et
rithm for binaural audio reproduction using loudspeak- al. Immersive sound rendering using laser-based track-
ers[C]//Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Au- ing[C]//Audio Engineering Society Convention 109. Au-
tomation (ICMTMA), 2010 International Conference on. dio Engineering Society, 2000.
IEEE, 2010, 1: 318–321. [91] Kim S, Kong D, Jang S. Adaptive virtual surround sound
[76] Wang J, Ye Q, Wu X. A robust frequency domain rendering system for an arbitrary listening position[J]. J.
crosstalk cancellation algorithm[C]//Computer Applica- Audio Eng. Soc., 2008, 56(4): 243–254.
tion and System Modeling (ICCASM), 2010 International [92] Sandvad J. Dynamic aspects of auditory virtual envi-
Conference on. IEEE, 2010, 4: V4-568–V4-571. ronments[C]//Audio Engineering Society Convention 100.
[77] Bai M R, Tung C W, Lee C C. Optimal design of loud- Audio Engineering Society, 1996.
speaker arrays for robust cross-talk cancellation using the [93] Wenzel E M, Miller J D, Abel J S. Sound lab: a real-
Taguchi method and the genetic algorithm[J]. J. Acoust. time, software-based system for the study of spatial hear-
Soc. Am., 2005, 117(5): 2802–2813. ing[C]//Audio Engineering Society Convention 108. Au-
[78] Xu H, Wang Q, Xia R, et al. A stochastic approxima- dio Engineering Society, 2000.
tion method with enhanced robustness for crosstalk can- [94] Bronkhorst A W. Localization of real and virtual sound
cellation[J]. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 2017, 26(6): sources[J]. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1995, 98(5): 2542–2553.
1269–1275. [95] Wenzel E M. Effect of increasing system latency on lo-
[79] Ward D B, Elko G W. Effect of loudspeaker position on calization of virtual sounds[C]//Audio Engineering Soci-
the robustness of acoustic crosstalk cancellation[J]. IEEE ety Conference: 16th International Conference: Spatial
Signal Process. Lett., 1999, 6(5): 106–108. Sound Reproduction. Audio Engineering Society, 1999.
[80] Ward D B, Elko G W. A new robust system for 3D au- [96] Brungart D, Kordik A J, Simpson B D. Effects of head
dio using loudspeakers[C]//Acoustics, Speech, and Signal tracker latency in virtual audio displays[J]. J. Audio Eng.
Processing, 2000. ICASSP’00. Proceedings. 2000 IEEE Soc., 2006, 54(1/2): 32–44.
International Conference on. IEEE, 2000, 2: II781–II784. [97] Stitt P, Hendrickx E, Messonnier J C, et al. The influence
[81] Yang J, Gan W S, Tan S E. Improved sound separation us- of head tracking latency on binaural rendering in simple
ing three loudspeakers[J]. Acoustics Research Letters On- and complex sound scenes[C]//Audio Engineering Society
line, 2003, 4(2): 47–52. Convention 140. Audio Engineering Society, 2016.
[82] Zheng J, Lu J, Qiu X. Linear optimal source distribu- [98] Krebber W, Gierlich H W, Genuit K. Auditory virtual
tion mapping for binaural sound reproduction[C]//Inter- environments: basics and applications for interactive sim-
Noise and Noise-Con Congress and Conference Proceed- ulations[J]. Signal Processing, 2000, 80(11): 2307–2322.
ings. Institute of Noise Control Engineering, 2014, 249(7): [99] Simpson B D, Brungart D S, Gilkey R H, et al. Spa-
939–946. tial audio displays for improving safety and enhancing
[83] Zheng J, Zhu T, Lu J, et al. A linear robust binaural situation awareness in general aviation environments[R].
sound reproduction system with optimal source distribu- Wright State Univ. Dayton Oh Dept. of Psychology,
tion strategy[J]. J. Audio Eng. Soc., 2015, 63(9): 725–735. 2005.
[84] Kirkeby O, Nelson P A, Hamada H. The “stereo dipole”: [100] Jones D L, Stanney K M, Foaud H. An optimized spatial
a virtual source imaging system using two closely spaced audio system for virtual training simulations: design and
loudspeakers[J]. J. Audio Eng. Soc., 1998, 46(5): 387–395. evaluation[C]. Georgia Institute of Technology, 2005.
[85] Takeuchi T, Nelson P A. Optimal source distribution for [101] Jin C, Kan A, Lin D, et al. 3DApe: a real-time 3D audio
binaural synthesis over loudspeakers[J]. J. Acoust. Soc. playback engine[C]//Audio Engineering Society Conven-
Am., 2002, 112(6): 2786–2797. tion 118. Audio Engineering Society, 2005.
[86] Takeuchi T, Nelson P A. Extension of the optimal [102] Cecchi S, Virgulti M, Primavera A, et al. Investigation
source distribution for binaural sound reproduction[J]. on audio algorithms architecture for stereo portable de-
Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 2008, 94(6): 981–987. vices[J]. J. Audio Eng. Soc., 2016, 64(1/2): 75–88.
[87] Kim Y, Deille O, Nelson P A. Crosstalk cancellation in [103] Bai M R, Hong J R. Signal processing implementation and
virtual acoustic imaging systems for multiple listeners[J]. comparison of automotive spatial sound rendering strate-
J. Sound Vib., 2006, 297(1/2): 251–266. gies[J]. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music
[88] Masiero B, Qiu X. Two listeners crosstalk cancellation Processing, 2009, 2009(1): 876297.
system modelled by four point sources and two rigid [104] Zhang C, Cai Q, Chou P A, et al. Viewport: a distributed,
spheres[J]. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 2009, immersive teleconferencing system with infrared dot pat-
95(2): 379–385. tern[J]. IEEE Multi Media, 2013, 20(1): 17–27.