Page 73 - 《应用声学》2020年第1期

第 39 卷 第 1 期 印兴耀等： 五维地震油气识别方法 69

᥋Ղ ani model study[M]//SEG Technical Program Expanded Ab-
30 60 90 120 150 180 f
2200 B̌  stracts 1998. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1998:
Ǎ  66–69.
2100 H1 
௑ᫎ/ms 2200  [5] Hoffmann J, Rekdal T, Hegna S. Improving the data qual-
ity in marine streamer seismic by increased cross-line sam-
2300  pling[M]//SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts

2400 H2 2002. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2002: 85–88.
[6] Kapoor J, Moldevaneau N, Egan M, et al. Subsalt imag-
图 4 实际工区流体反演结果 ing: the RAZ–WAZ experience[J]. The Leading Edge,
Fig. 4 Estimation of anisotropic fluid factor of 2007, 26(11): 1414–1422.
reservoir [7] Corcoran C, Perkins C, Lee D, et al. A wide-azimuth
streamer acquisition pilot project in the Gulf of Mexico[J].
4 结论 The Leading Edge, 2007, 26(4): 460–468.
[8] Palaz I, Marfurt K J. Carbonate seismology[M]. Society
of Exploration Geophysicists, 1997.
本文结合Gassmann双相各向异性理论和线性
[9] 周文. 裂缝性油气储集层评价方法 [M]. 成都: 四川科学技术
滑动理论推导出的含流体 HTI 介质的刚度矩阵，构 出版社, 1998.
建了一种新的各向异性因子 f ani ，在弱各向异性假 [10] 熊翥. 21 世纪初中期油气地球物理技术展望 [M]. 北京: 石油
设条件下，建立各向异性因子 f ani 与弹性模量和 工业出版社, 2006.
[11] Dillon L, Schwedersky G, Vásquez G, et al. A multiscale
Thomsen参数的关系。多种流体因子的敏感性比较 DHI elastic attributes evaluation[J]. The Leading Edge,
表明，各向异性因子 f ani 在各向异性储层比其他流 2003, 22(10): 1024–1029.
体因子更敏感。最后，充分利用五维实际地震数据 [12] Hudson J A. Wave speeds and attenuation of elastic waves
in material containing cracks[J]. Geophysical Journal In-
中丰富的方位各向异性信息，通过方位弹性阻抗反
ternational, 1981, 64(1): 133–150.
演实现各向异性因子的求取，分析可知，反演结果与 [13] Smith G C, Gidlow P M. Weighted stacking for rock
测井解释资料有很好的吻合，该方法为五维地震流 property estimation and detection of gas[J]. Geophysical
Prospecting, 1987, 35(9): 993–1014.
体识别提供一种新的途径。综上，为提高储层流体
[14] Schoenberg M, Sayers C M. Seismic anisotropy of frac-
类型的判识准确度，构建能够精细反映各向异性储 tured rock[J]. Geophysics, 1995, 60(1): 204–211.
层油气分布的流体因子是基础，选用有效的地震反 [15] Goodway B, Chen T, Downton J. Improved AVO fluid
演算法是关键，精度高、稳定性好的各向异性反演 detection and lithology discrimination using Lamé petro-
physical parameters; λρ”,“µρ”, & “λ/µ fluid stack”,
算法可以有效避免误差影响，有助于储层流体类型
from P and S inversions[M]//SEG Technical Program Ex-
的可靠判识，在实际资料应用中，应尽可能选用全方 panded Abstracts 1997. Society of Exploration Geophysi-
位五维叠前地震数据提高各向异性反演的可靠性。 cists, 1997: 183–186.
[16] Smith G C, Gidlow M. The fluid factor angle and the
crossplot angle[M]//SEG Technical Program Expanded
Abstracts 2003. Society of Exploration Geophysicists,
参 考 文 献
2003: 185–188.
[17] Quakenbush M, Shang B, Tuttle C. Poisson impedance[J].
[1] Vermeer G J O. Creating image gathers in the absence of The Leading Edge, 2006, 25(2): 128–138.
proper common-offset gathers[J]. Exploration Geophysics, [18] Russell B H, Hedlin K, Hilterman F J, et al. Fluid-
1998, 29(3/4): 636–642. property discrimination with AVO: a Biot-Gassmann per-
[2] Cary P W. Common-offset-vector gathers: an alternative spective[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(1): 29–39.
to cross-spreads for wide-azimuth 3-D surveys[M]//SEG [19] Russell B H, Gray D, Hampson D P. Linearized AVO and
Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1999. Society of poroelasticity[J]. Geophysics, 2011, 76(3): C19–C29.
Exploration Geophysicists, 1999: 1496–1499. [20] Xue J, Gu H, Cai C. Model-based amplitude versus offset
[3] 印兴耀, 张洪学, 宗兆云. OVT 数据域五维地震资料解释技术 and azimuth inversion for estimating fracture parameters
研究现状与进展 [J]. 石油物探, 2018, 57(2): 155–178. and fluid content[J]. Geophysics, 2017, 82(2): M1–M17.
Yin Xingyao, Zhang Hongxue, Zong Zhaoyun. Research [21] 印兴耀, 曹丹平, 王保丽, 等. 基于叠前地震反演的流体识别
status and progress of 5D seismic data interpretation in 方法研究进展 [J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2014, 49(1): 22–34,
OVT domain[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 46.
2018, 57(2): 155–178. Yin Xingyao, Cao Danping, Wang Baoli, et al. Research
[4] Etgen J, Regone C. Strike shooting, dip shooting, wide- progress of fluid discrimination with pre-stack seismic
patch shooting—Does prestack depth migration care? A inversion[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2014, 49(1):