Page 153 - 《应用声学》2022年第5期

第 41 卷 第 5 期 赵焕绮等： 中国人典型用餐环境中的隆巴尔效应及噪声对消费情况的影响 829

况的影响，同时进行中西餐厅环境下相关结果的比 [5] Hodgson M, Steininger G, Razavi Z. Measurement and
较分析。 prediction of speech and noise levels and the Lombard ef-
fect in eating establishments[J]. The Journal of the Acous-
结果表明，与西方餐厅中的隆巴尔斜率相
tical Society of America, 2007, 121(4): 2023–2033.
比 [3−4] ，本文的实验室实验中隆巴尔斜率偏低，约 [6] Bottalico P. Lombard effect, ambient noise, and willing-
为 0.4 dB(A)/dB(A)；隆巴尔斜率明显变大的起点 ness to spend time and money in a restaurant[J]. The
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018, 144(3):
范围大致相同 [5] ，大约在55 ∼ 60 dB(A)。在现场实 EL209–EL214.
验中，声级变化较稳定部分的隆巴尔斜率整体相对 [7] 康健, 韩志慧, 孙建邦. 高校餐厅声环境 [J]. 建筑科学, 2017,
于西方和中国餐厅的实验室实验都偏高，整体的平 33(2): 47–53.
Kang Jian, Han Zhihui, Sun Jianbang. Sound environ-
均斜率为1.58 dB(A)/dB(A)。 ment of restaurants in colleges[J]. Building Science, 2017,
本文结果表明，背景噪声声级大小是噪声干扰 33(2): 47–53.
程度的重要因素，而且噪声干扰程度越高对消费者 [8] 郑晓林, 章斯宇. 高校公共食堂声环境调查 [J]. 电声技术,
2013, 37(2): 11–13, 16.
消费意愿的消极影响越大。因此在中国人典型用餐 Zheng Xiaolin, Zhang Siyu. Survey of acoustic environ-
环境中，背景噪声的总声级最好不要超过隆巴尔斜 ment of public canteens of universities[J]. Audio Engineer-
率明显变大的起点 55 ∼ 60 dB(A)。在实际应用中 ing, 2013, 37(2): 11–13, 16.
[9] Bottalico P, Passione I I, Graetzer S, et al. Evaluation of
需做进一步的细化研究，针对不同类型的餐厅确定 the starting point of the Lombard effect[J]. Acta Acustica
不同的参数。 united with Acustica, 2017, 103(1): 169–172.
[10] Astolfi A, Filippi M. Good acoustical quality in restau-
rants: a compromise between speech intelligibility and
privacy[C]. Proceedings of ICA, 2004: 1201–1204.
参 考 文 献
[11] Rindel J. Acoustical capacity as a means of noise control
in eating establishments[C]. Proceedings of BNAM, 2012.
[1] Zagat. The state of American dining in 2016[EB/OL]. [12] Novak C, Lopa L. Effects of sound pressure levels and
[2018-04-13]. https://www.zagat.com/b/the-state-of-american- sensitivity to noise on mood and behavioral intent in a
diningin-2016. controlled fine dining restaurant environment[J]. Journal
[2] 王明玉. 中式餐厅室内声环境研究 [D]. 西安: 长安大学, of Culinary Science & Technology, 2010, 8(4): 191–218.
2012. [13] 电声学声级计第 1 部分: 规范: JIS C1509–1–2017[S].
[3] Pick H L, Siegel G M, Fox P W, et al. Inhibiting the [14] 杜功焕. 声学基础 [M]. 上海: 上海科技出版社, 1982: 417–
Lombard effect[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society 520.
of America, 1989, 85(2): 894–900. [15] Nahid M, Hodgson M. Prediction of optimal conditions for
[4] Lazarus H. Prediction of verbal communication is noise— verbal-communication quality in eating establishments[J].
A review: part 1[J]. Applied Acoustics, 1986, 19(6): 439– The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2011,
464. 129(4): 2005–2014.