Page 114 - 《应用声学》2020年第1期

110 2020 年 1 月

流量水景声在现场评分高而实验室评分低，小流速 Mao Linqing, Kang Jian, Jin Hong. Acoustic character-
流量水景声在实验室和安静的环境中评分较高，但 istics of Miao and Han ethnic groups, traditional settle-
ment space in Guizhou province[J]. Architectural Journal,
在吵闹的环境中评分较低。可以将大流速流量水景
2013(S2): 130–134.
布置在道路附近掩蔽交通噪声，将小流速流量水景 [6] Jeon J Y, Hwang I H, Hong J Y. Soundscape evaluation
布置在安静庭院内提高声景观品质。 in a Catholic cathedral and Buddhist temple precincts
through social surveys and soundwalks[J]. Journal of the
现场视听感知实验发现，声环境满意度与视
Acoustical Society of America, 2014, 135(4): 1863–1874.
觉景观优美度、安静度、声源组成喜好度之间均 [7] 张东旭, 相月, 陶绪一. 辽宁地区藏传佛教寺院声景研究 [J].
存在显著正相关关系，相关系数分别为 r = 0.637 建筑科学, 2017, 33(8): 68–73, 82.
Zhang Dongxu, Xiang Yue, Tao Xuyi. The soundscape in
(p = 0.000)、r = 0.370 (p = 0.000)、r = 0.538
the Tibetan Buddhist Temples in Liaoning area[J]. Build-
(p = 0.000)，估算边界均值图呈正向线性趋势；声 ing Science, 2017, 33(8): 68–73, 82.
环境满意度与声压级之间存在显著负相关关系，相 [8] 邓志勇, 刘爱利, 陈昊骙. 历史文化街区声景语义的主观评价
关系数为 r = −0.254 (p = 0.000)，但当较高的环境 研究 ——基于人文地理学的视角 [J]. 人文地理, 2014, 29(1):
35–42.
声压级由水景声贡献时，其声环境满意度明显提高。 Deng Zhiyong, Liu Aili, Chen Haokui. Semantic analysis
四季与视觉景观优美度、安静度对声环境满意度有 for the soundscape of historical and cultural areas: an ap-
显著交互差异。声环境满意度与视觉景观优美度、 proach of human geography[J]. Human Geography, 2014,
29(1): 35–42.
声源组成喜好度、声压级之间存在多重线性关系，可
[9] 黄凌江, 康健. 历史地段的声景 ——拉萨老城案例研究 [J].
以建立回归方程。 新建筑, 2014(5): 26–31.
由以上结果可知，应从提高视觉景观优美度、 Huang Lingjiang, Kang Jian. Soundscape in historic envi-
ronment: a case study of Lhasa[J]. New Building, 2014(5):
优化声源组成、降低环境声压级等方面进行声景观
26–31.
优化设计。通过减少交通声、增加泉声、引入动物 [10] Barber J R, Burdett C L, Reed S E, et al. Anthropogenic
声、保护传统生活声等声元素设计来保护与发展济 noise exposure in protected natural areas: estimating the
scale of ecological consequences[J]. Landscape Ecology,
南老城历史街区的特色泉水声景观。
2011, 26(9): 1281–1295.
论文为声元素喜好度和声环境满意度研究提 [11] Jeon J Y, Lee P J, Hong J Y, et al. Non-auditory factors
供参考。但本次研究中未考虑参与者自身因素对评 affecting urban soundscape evaluation[J]. Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America, 2011, 130(6): 3761–3770.
价结果的影响，今后应进一步探讨人文差异对声景
[12] Tse M S, Chau C W, Choy Y Z, et al. Perception of urban
观评价的影响。 park soundscape[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 2012, 131(4): 2762–2771.
[13] Liu J, Kang J, Behmb H, et al. Effects of landscape on
参 考 文 献 soundscape perception: soundwalks in city parks[J]. Land-
scape and Urban Planning, 2014, 123: 30–40.
[1] 洪昕晨, 张薇, 朱里莹, 等. 城市公园声景观危险度评价研 [14] 刘江, 郁珊珊, 王亚军, 等. 城市公园景观与声景体验的交互
究 [J]. 应用声学, 2016, 35(6): 539–546. 作用研究 [J]. 中国园林, 2017, 33(12): 86–90.
Hong Xinchen, Zhang Wei, Zhu Liying, et al. Soundscape Liu Jiang, Yu Shanshan, Wang Yajun, et al. Research on
risk degree evaluation in urban park[J]. Journal of Applied the interaction effect between landscape and soundscape
Acoustics, 2016, 35(6): 539–546. experience in city parks[J]. Chinese Landscape Architec-
[2] Tse M S, Chau C K, Choy Y S, et al. Perception of urban ture, 2017, 33(12): 86–90.
park soundscape[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of [15] Brambilla G, Maffei L, di Gabriele M, et al. Merging
America, 2012, 131(4): 2762–2771. physical parameters and laboratory subjective ratings for
[3] Brambilla G, Gallo V, Asdrubali F, et al. The perceived the soundscape assessment of urban squares[J]. Journal of
quality of soundscape in three urban parks in Rome[J]. the Acoustical Society of America, 2013, 134(1): 782–790.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013, 134(1): [16] Jeon J Y, Hong J Y, Lavandier C, et al. A cross-national
832–839. comparison in assessment of urban park soundscapes in
[4] Jeon J Y, Lee P J, You J. Urban space design based on France, Korea, and Sweden through laboratory experi-
the perceptual assessment of soundscape[J]. Journal of the ments[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2018, 133: 107–117.
Acoustical Society of America, 2010, 128(4): 2369. [17] 葛坚, 陆江, 郭宏峰, 等. 城市开放空间声景观形态构成及设
[5] 毛琳箐, 康健, 金虹. 贵州苗、汉族传统聚落空间声学特征研 计研究 [J]. 浙江大学学报 (工学版), 2006, 40(9): 1569–1573.
究 [J]. 建筑学报, 2013(S2): 130–134. Ge Jian, Lu Jiang, Guo Hongfeng, et al. Research on