Page 149 - 《应用声学》2021年第6期
P. 149

第 40 卷 第 6 期       赵擎华等: 共振峰编辑法区别鼻化元音中口、鼻音共振峰的实证探究                                          945


             [16] Hawkins S, Stevens K N. Acoustic and perceptual corre-  Qin Lingjuan, Bao Ziwei. Factors of affecting the sub-
                 lates of the non-nasal–nasal distinction for vowels[J]. The  jective perception of sound quality[J]. Audio Engineering,
                 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1985, 77(4):  1990(5): 1–11.
                 1560–1575.                                     [25] Kiefte M, Enright T, Marshall L. The role of formant am-
             [17] 方强, 李爱军. 普通话鼻化元音的研究 [C]// 第六届全国现代                plitude in the perception of/i/and/u[J]. The Journal of the
                 语音学学术会议论文集 (上), 2003.                             Acoustical Society of America, 2010, 127(4): 2611–2621.
             [18] 鲍怀翘, 林茂灿. 实验语音学概要 [M]. 增订版. 北京: 北京大
                                                                [26] Andrus J. The Perception and neural representation of
                 学出版社, 2014: 115, 107–113.
                                                                   individual harmonics in a vowel sound: a behavioral and
             [19] 李敬阳, 崔效义, 王莉.    声纹鉴定中共振峰的选定与应
                                                                   auditory brainstem evoked response study[D]. Nova Sco-
                 用 [C]//第六届全国现代语音学学术会议. 中国中文信息
                                                                   tia: Dalhousie University, 2012.
                 学会, 2007: 574–576.
                                                                [27] Lindqvist-Gauffin J, Pauli S. The role of relative spectrum
             [20] Zhao C, Dang J, Wang Y, et al.  Individual varia-
                                                                   levels in vowel perception[J]. Speech Transmission Labora-
                 tion of morphological and acoustic effects of the nasal
                                                                   tory. Quarterly Progress and Status Reports, 1968, 9(4):
                 tract[C]//2013 IEEE China Summit and International
                                                                   12–15.
                 Conference on Signal and Information Processing. IEEE,
                                                                [28] Ainsworth W A, Millar J B. The effect of relative formant
                 2013: 337–341.
                                                                   amplitude on the perceived identity of synthetic vowels[J].
             [21] Joos M. Acoustic phonetics[J]. Language, 1948, 24(2):
                                                                   Language and Speech, 1972, 15(4): 328–341.
                 5–136.
             [22] Delattre P. The physiological interpretation of sound  [29] Aaltonen O. The effect of relative amplitude levels of F2
                 spectrogram[J]. Publications of the Modern Language As-  and F3 on the categorization of synthetic vowels[J]. Jour-
                 sociation of America, 1951, 66(5): 864–875.       nal of Phonetics, 1985, 13(1): 1–9.
             [23] 时秀娟. 鼻音研究 [M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2017:           [30] Hedrick M S, Nabelek A K. Effect of F2 intensity on
                 35–39.                                            identity of/u/in degraded listening conditions[J]. Journal
             [24] 秦伶娟, 包紫薇. 影响音质主观感觉的因素 [J]. 电声技术,                 of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2004, 47(5):
                 1990(5): 1–11.                                    1012–1021.
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154