Page 159 - 《应用声学》2023年第2期

第 42 卷 第 2 期 朱玉洁等： 森林公园声景对心理恢复效益的影响 ——以福州国家森林公园为例 347

在鸟鸣声和蝉鸣声保护和创造上，应注重保护 [7] Van H S C, Nusbaum H C, Clohisy L, et al. Of cricket
生物多样性及自然溪流资源，为鸟类等动物提供良 chirps and car horns: the effect of nature sounds on cog-
nitive performance[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
好的栖息空间，可种植引鸟植物如木棉等，此外，可
2019, 26(2): 522–530.
以利用浅水设置石头或木桩吸引鸟类。对于流水声， [8] Benfield J A, Derrick T B, Peter N, et al. Natural sound
一方面，可以通过物理的方式创造，如利用石头使溪 facilitates mood recovery[J]. Ecopsychology, 2014, 6(3):
流的宽度产生变化，引导水流或者阻止水流以产生 183–188.
[9] Anna C, Tony C. A methodological approach to under-
更有趣的声音，创造落差，利用落差创造跌水；另一
standing the wellbeing and restorative benefits associated
方面，营造亲水空间，可以通过合理设置冥想平台， with greenspace[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,
休息缓坡，水上汀步等创造聆听水声的机会。 2016, 19: 103–109.
[10] 赵警卫, 杨士乐, 张莉. 声景观对视觉美学感知效应的影响 [J].
4 结论 城市问题, 2017(4): 41–46, 51.
Zhao Jingwei, Yang Shile, Zhang Li. Influences of sound-
scape on visual aesthetic preference[J]. Urban Problems,
不同森林公园环境的心理恢复效益存在差异， 2017(4): 41–46, 51.
以蓝绿空间为主的环境心理恢复效益较人工要素 [11] Deng L, Luo H, Ma J, et al. Effects of integration between
过多或太过幽静环境的心理恢复效益高。声景加入 visual stimuli and auditory stimuli on restorative potential
and aesthetic preference in urban green spaces[J]. Urban
后森林公园的心理恢复效益会改变，除谈话声和儿
Forestry & Urban Greening, 2020, 53: 126702.
童嬉戏声较突出的样地 (S5) 以外的其他视听组合 [12] Sang H P, Lee P J, Jung T, et al. Effects of the aural and
的刺激 (有声视频) 都比单一视觉刺激 (无声视频) visual experience on psycho-physiological recovery in ur-
更具有心理恢复效益。鸟鸣声、蝉鸣声、流水声等自 ban and rural environments[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2020,
169: 107486.
然声对心理恢复效益具有积极作用。声景是森林公
[13] 翁羽西, 朱玉洁, 董嘉莹, 等. 校园绿地声景观对情绪和注意力
园恢复性环境设计的关键要素。 的影响——以福建农林大学为例 [J]. 中国园林, 2021, 37(2):
88–93.
Weng Yuxi, Zhu Yujie, Dong Jiaying, et al. Effects
参 考 文 献 of soundscape on emotion and attention on campus
green space —A case study of Fujian Agriculture and
Forestry University[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture,
[1] Zhu J, Xu C. Sina microblog sentiment in Beijing city 2021, 37(2): 88–93.
parks as measure of demand for urban green space dur-
[14] Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, et al. Auditory and non-
ing the COVID-19[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,
auditory effects of noise on health[J]. The Lancet, 2014,
2021, 58: 126913.
383(9925): 1325–1332.
[2] Spano G, D’Este M, Giannico V, et al. Association be-
[15] Alvarsson J J, Wiens S, Nilsson M E. Stress recov-
tween indoor-outdoor green features and psychological
ery during exposure to nature sound and environmental
health during the COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: a cross-
noise[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research
sectional nationwide study[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban
and Public Health, 2010, 7(3): 1036–1046.
Greening, 2021, 62: 127156.
[16] 郝泽周, 王成, 徐心慧, 等. 深圳城市森林声景观对人体心理
[3] Cheng Y Y, Zhang J G, Wei W, et al. Effects of urban
parks on residents’ expressed happiness before and during 及生理影响分析 [J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(3): 231–239.
Hao Zezhou, Wang Cheng, Xu Xinhui, et al. Effect
the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Landscape and Urban Plan-
of Shenzhen urban forest soundscape on psychological
ning, 2021, 212: 104118.
and physiological changes of human beings[J]. Journal of
[4] Acoustics-Soundscape-Part 1: definition and conceptual
framework: ISO 12913-1: 2014[S]. Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(3): 231–239.
[5] Suko Y, Saito K, Takayama N, et al. Effect of faint [17] Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A G, et al. G*Power 3: a
road traffic noise mixed in birdsong on the perceived flexible statistical power analysis program for the social,
restorativeness and listeners’ physiological response: an behavioral, and biomedical sciences[J]. Behavior Research
exploratory study[J]. International Journal of Environ- Methods, 2007, 39(2): 175–191.
mental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(24): 4985. [18] 王雁, 陈鑫峰. 心理物理学方法在国外森林景观评价中的应
[6] Jo H, Song C, Ikei H, et al. Physiological and psychologi- 用 [J]. 林业科学, 1999(5): 110–117.
cal effects of forest and urban sounds using high-resolution Wang Yan, Chen Xinfeng. Application of psychophysi-
sound sources [J]. International Journal of Environmental cal method in evaluation of foreign forest landscapes[J].
Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(15): 2649. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1999(5): 110–117.