Page 73 - 201806
P. 73
第 37 卷 第 6 期 崔宝龙等: 基于集合卡尔曼变换的东中国海声学敏感区判定方法 903
Meteorologica Sinica, 2014, 72(5): 1001–1011. [29] Szunyogh I, Toth Z, Morse R E, et al. The effect of
[21] Mu M, Dijkstra H A. The sensitivity and stability of targeted dropsonde observation during the 1999 Winter
the ocean’s thermohaline circulation of finite amplitude Storm Reconnaissance Program[J]. Monthly Weather Re-
perturbation[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2004, view, 2000, 128(10): 3520–3537.
34(10): 2305–2315. [30] 田伟红. 集合变换卡尔曼滤波方法在集合预报和适应性观测
[22] Mu M, Zhou F F, Wang H L. A method for identifying the 中的初步应用 [D]. 北京: 中国气象科学研究院, 2006.
sensitive areas in targeted observation for tropical cyclone
[31] 马旭林, 薛纪善, 陆维松. GRAPES 全球集合预报的集合卡
prediction: conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation[J].
尔曼变换初始扰动方案初步研究 [J]. 气象学报, 2008, 66(4):
Monthly Weather Review, 2009, 137(5): 1623–1639.
526–536.
[23] 谭晓伟, 王斌, 王栋梁. 基于条件非线性最优扰动的目标观
Ma Xulin, Xue Jishan, Lu Weisong. Preliminary study on
测中瞄准区不同引导性变量的影响试验研究 [J]. 气象学报,
ensemble transform Kalman filter based on initial pertur-
2011, 69(3): 400–411.
bation scheme in GRAPES global ensemble prediction[J].
Tan Xiaowei, Wang Bin, Wang Dongliang. Experimental
Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2008, 66(4): 526–536.
studies of the impacts of the different guidances of tar-
[32] 马旭林, 于月明, 姜胜, 等. 基于集合卡尔曼变换的目标观
geting areas on the targeting observations based on the
测敏感区识别系统优化及影响试验 [J]. 大气科学学报, 2014,
CNOP method[J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2011, 69(3):
37(6): 749–757.
400–411.
Ma Xulin, Yu Yueming, Jiang Sheng, et al. Optimiza-
[24] 周菲凡, 张贺. 基于 CNOP 方法的台风目标观测中三种敏感
tion and influence experiment to identify sensitive areas
区确定方案的比较研究 [J]. 大气科学, 2014, 38(2): 261–272.
for target observation on ETKF method [J]. Transactions
Zhou Feifan, Zhang He. Study of the schemes based on
of Atmospheric Sciences, 2014, 37(6): 749–757.
CNOP method to identify sensitive areas for typhoon tar-
[33] 张宇, 陈德辉, 薛纪善, 等. 湿度因子对适应性观测敏感区估
geted observations[J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sci-
算的影响研究 [J]. 气象学报, 2012, 70(1): 91–100.
ences, 2014, 38(2): 261–272.
Zhang Yu, Chen Dehui, Xue Jishan, et al. Study of the
[25] Bishop C H, Toth Z. Ensemble transformation and adap-
influence of the humidity factor on estimation in the adap-
tive observations[J]. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences,
tive observation sensitive region[J]. Acta Meteor Sinica,
1999, 56(11): 1748–1765.
2012, 70(1): 91–100.
[26] Bishop C H, Etherton B J, Majumdar S J. Adaptive sam-
pling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part [34] 笪良龙, 过武宏, 赵建昕, 等. 海洋 -声学耦合模式捕捉水声环
I: Theoretical aspects[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2001, 境不确定性 [J]. 声学学报, 2015, 40(3): 477–486.
129(3): 420–436. Da Lianglong, Guo Wuhong, Zhao Jianxin, et al. Capture
[27] Majumdar S J, Bishop C H, Etherton B J, et al. Adap- uncertainty of underwater environment by ocean-acoustic
tive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman fil- coupled model[J]. Acta Acustica, 2015, 40(3): 477–486.
ter. PartII: Field program implementation[J]. Monthly [35] 过武宏, 笪良龙, 赵建昕. 动态水声环境不确定性的估计与分
Weather Review, 2002, 130(5): 1356–1369. 析 [J]. 应用声学, 2013, 32(6): 464–472.
[28] Szunyogh I, Toth Z, Zimin I, et al. Propagation of the Guo Wuhong, Da Lianglong, Zhao Jianxin. Uncertainty
effect of targeted observation: the 2000 winter storm re- estimation and analysis for dynamic underwater acoustic
connaissance program[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2002, environment[J]. Journal of Applied Acoustics, 2013, 32(6):
130(130): 1144–1165. 464–472.