Page 135 - 《应用声学》2025年第2期
P. 135

第 44 卷 第 2 期               舒珊等: 恢复性视角下城市小微绿地声环境研究                                           395


              [8] Hsieh C H, Yang J Y, Huang C W, et al. The effect of  [20] Gozalo G R, Morillas J M B, González D M. Perceptions
                 water sound level in virtual reality: A study of restorative  and use of urban green spaces on the basis of size[J]. Ur-
                 benefits in young adults through immersive natural envi-  ban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 46: 126470.
                 ronments[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2023,  [21] Nordh H, Østby K. Pocket parks for people—A study of
                 88: 102012.                                       park design and use[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Green-
              [9] Payne S R, Bruce N. Exploring the relationship between  ing, 2013, 12(1): 12–17.
                 urban quiet areas and perceived restorative benefits[J]. In-  [22] 周聪惠. 城市微绿地的基本属性与规划关键问题 [J]. 国际城
                 ternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public  市规划, 2022, 37(3): 105–113.
                 Health, 2019, 16(9): 1611.                        Zhou Conghui. Basic attributes and key planning issues of
             [10] Guo X, Liu J, Albert C, et al.  Audio-visual interac-  micro green space[J]. Urban Planning International, 2022,
                 tion and visitor characteristics affect perceived sound-  37(3): 105–113.
                 scape restorativeness: Case study in five parks in China[J].  [23] Peschardt K K, Stigsdotter U K. Associations between
                 Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2022, 77: 127738.  park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small
             [11] 刘江, 郭渲, 洪昕晨, 等. 城市公园声景恢复性效益感知的个                  public urban green spaces[J]. Landscape and Urban Plan-
                 体影响因素研究 [J]. 中国园林, 2022, 38(9): 40–45.            ning, 2013, 112(1): 26–39.
                 Liu Jiang, Guo Xuan, Hong Xinchen, et al. The impact  [24] Xu J X, Wang F H, Chen L, et al.  Perceived urban
                 of individual factors on perceived soundscape restorative-  green and residents’ health in Beijing[J]. SSM-Population
                 ness in urban parks[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture,  Health, 2021, 14: 100790.
                 2022, 38(9): 40–45.                            [25] Peschardt K K, Stigsdotter U K, Schipperrijn J. Iden-
             [12] 罗召鑫, 马蕙, 舒珊. 城市滨水空间恢复性评价的视听影响因                   tifying features of pocket parks that may be related to
                 素研究 [J]. 南方建筑, 2021(1): 76–82.                    health promoting use[J]. Landscape Research, 2016, 41(1):
                 Luo Zhaoxin, Ma Hui, Shu Shan. A social survey on the  79–94.
                 visual and auditory factors influencing restorative percep-  [26] Acoustics-Soundscape-Part 2 Data collection and report-
                 tions of urban waterfront spaces[J]. South Architecture,  ing requirements: ISO/TS 12913-2: 2018[S].
                 2021(1): 76–82.                                [27] Ma H, Su H, Cui J. Characterization of soundscape per-
             [13] 杜春雨, 欧达毅, 徐涵, 等. 城市健康步道声景调查及其对游客                 ception of preschool children[J]. Building and Environ-
                 心境状态的影响研究 [J]. 建筑科学, 2022, 38(10): 116–122.       ment, 2022, 214: 108921.
                 Du Chunyu, Ou Dayi, Xu Han, et al.  Research on  [28] 洪昕晨, 袁轶男, 潘明慧, 等. 基于声景生态学的竹林声景喜
                 soundscape survey of urban health trail and its influ-  好度评价研究 [J]. 建筑科学, 2018, 34(4): 66–71.
                 ence on tourists’ mood[J]. Building Science, 2022, 38(10):  Hong Xinchen, Yuan Yinan, Pan Minghui, et al. Pref-
                 116–122.                                          erence evaluation of bamboo forest soundscape based
             [14] 朱玉洁, 翁羽西, 王心怡, 等. 森林公园声景对心理恢复效益                  on soundscape ecology[J]. Building Science, 2018, 34(4):
                 的影响 ——以福州国家森林公园为例 [J]. 应用声学, 2023,                66–71.
                 42(2): 340–348.                                [29] Payne S R. The production of a perceived restorative-
                 Zhu Yujie, Weng Yuxi, Wang Xinyi, et al.  The ef-  ness soundscape scale[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2013, 74(2):
                 fect of soundscape in forest park on psychological ben-  255–263.
                 efits—Taking Fuzhou National Forest Park as an exam-  [30] Peschardt K K, Schipperijn J, Stigsdotter U K. Use
                 ple[J]. Journal of Applied Acoustics, 2023, 42(2): 340–348.  of small public urban green spaces (SPUGS)[J]. Urban
             [15] Nordh H, Evensen K H, Skår M. A peaceful place in the  Forestry & Urban Greening, 2012, 11(3): 235–244.
                 city—A qualitative study of restorative components of the  [31] 董贺轩, 刘乾, 王芳. 嵌入 · 修补 · 众规: 城市微型公共空间规
                 cemetery[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 167:  划研究 ——以武汉市汉阳区为例 [J]. 城市规划, 2018, 42(4):
                 108–117.                                          33–43.
             [16] Masullo M, CastanòF R A, Toma M L. Historical clois-  Dong Hexuan, Liu Qian, Wang Fang. Miniature pub-
                 ters and courtyards as quiet areas[J]. Sustainability, 2020,  lic space planning: A case study of Hanyang district in
                 12(7): 2887.                                      Wuhan[J]. City Planning Review, 2018, 42(4): 33–43.
             [17] Jeon J Y, Hwang I H, Hong J Y. Soundscape evaluation  [32] European Environmental Agency. Good practice guide
                 in a Catholic cathedral and Buddhist temple precincts  on quiet areas[R]. Luxembourg:Publications Office of the
                 through social surveys and soundwalks[J]. The Jour-  European Union, 2014.
                                                                [33] 舒珊, 杜倩倩, 朴勋, 等. 滨海公共空间声环境感知评价及影
                 nal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014, 135(4):
                 1863–1874.                                        响因素 [J]. 应用声学, 2024, 43(2): 393–403.
                                                                   Shu Shan, Du Qianqian, Piao Xun, et al. Acoustic en-
             [18] Uebel K, Marselle M, Dean A J, et al. Urban green space
                                                                   vironment perception and its influencing factors of costal
                 soundscapes and their perceived restorativeness[J]. People
                                                                   public space in Qingdao[J]. Journal of Applied Acoustics,
                 and Nature, 2021, 3(3): 756–769.
                                                                   2024, 43(2): 393–403.
             [19] Li H, Xie H, Woodward G. Soundscape components, per-
                                                                [34] Pérez-Martínez G, Torija A J, Ruiz D P. Soundscape as-
                 ceptions, and EEG reactions in typical mountainous ur-
                                                                   sessment of a monumental place: A methodology based
                 ban parks[J]. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2021,
                                                                   on the perception of dominant sounds[J]. Landscape and
                 64: 127269.
                                                                   Urban Planning, 2018, 169: 12–21.
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140